http://www.sloh.org/ncaa-athletics-employment/
One argument for paying college athletes
For some time there has been much debate about whether or not college athletes should be paid. Some people think that a scholarship should be payment enough. After all, a scholarship can easily be worth $ 15,000 – $ 25,000 or more per year, plus a career after college that may be worth a million dollars in a lifetime. In addition, student-athletes receive all kinds of benefits while in college, like staying at luxury hotels, being seen on national television, and all the notoriety that goes with being an athlete look. It is difficult to put a price on everything that.
However, considering the fact that certain college sports generate millions of dollars for college sports programs, many people believe that athletes are being used. If the average American football scholarship is worth $ 20,000 per year, however, the earnings of college $ 70,000 per year in income scholarship player (please note that this figure is only an estimate – the actual number could be higher), the university gain of $ 50,000 per year scholarship per player or $ 200,000 over four periods a year.
It is very difficult to put a numerical value on exactly how much of an athlete is a value to a university. A star quarterback will not only help sell tickets, but will bring a lot of merchandise sales. The CNCA not allow universities to sell a college football jersey with a player's name on it, but will sell the shirt with the player's number on it, which is easily recognized locally, and sometimes national markets. The major colleges earn huge sums of money in this type of merchandise only, however, the student athlete the number is to sell goods not see a dime of profit. To say that the student athlete is taking advantage of this situation is an understatement.
It goes beyond that. College athletic programs committee in millions of television and advertising contracts. They also bring in millions of dollars donations of sports promoters. Yes, wages should be paid to the Athletic directors and coaches, not to mention travel and other costs for the student athletes, and great that the biggest college football and basketball programs help fund non-profit, athletic programs. However, the fact of the matter is that, compared with the amount of revenue generated by student-athletes in their schools, what they get in return is very small.
Here is where it gets really interesting. An athlete can be "disciplined" for selling tickets to a fan on game day, but how much money the directors of the NCAA earn as a result of the efforts of the student athletes? The reality is that the college athletes literally paying for a large portion of the salaries of all employees by the NCAA. If an executive from the NCAA is able to drive a Mercedes, you can thank a star quarterback or running back for that, and maybe even walk to many components.
So here's the point: if the NCAA, coaches and athletic directors can earn huge sums of money from student athletes, if not student athletes have a piece of cake, too? This does not mean that college athletes should pay large sums of money, but it would certainly be nice if they would pay a fellowship little more to go eat pizza once in a while, or buy nice clothes – just a little extra spending money as a way of saying "thanks" for their efforts.
If for some reason college athletes can be paid, which opens a whole new can of worms. All athletes in a football team with 125 players work very hard in practice, but only 11can start on offense and defense – you only pay the headlines?. Also, if you had to pay more for the star quarterback what you do for an "ok" on the receiver, to be run on a host of other problems. That said, the first thing you want to avoid the payment of athletes Dispute college student athletes is how much money they earn or gain, which occurs frequently in the NFL.
The second thing I want to avoid is a playground uneven. While some schools in the Division I level could pay the athletes, many simply do not bring in enough revenue. If a student-athlete knows he can win more USC in what will be whether to play for his state university, then the playing field becomes more unequal than it already is. Athletes almost always choose the schools 'money' at other universities. Technically, this is the case today than people think, because most schools of tradition, best coaches, and the best records are usually the schools with the money … but most, if a university can afford to pay more to athletes from other schools, playing fields would be even more unequal.
If you're going to start paying athletes, all athletes must be paid the same amount of money, and all schools would that have the same amount of money to pay their athletes, which could be pre-determined by the NCAA. Although this amount was a little as $ 1,000 per year, per player (which is ($ 125,000 per year for a football team with 125 players), payable monthly during the school year would be much fairer to student-athletes … and most schools in the Division I level could certainly afford it. A few schools that could afford it, you could always NCAA put money in excess of the millions generated by the bowl game. Another alternative would be to cut the salaries of all executives of the rich has fallen NCAA NCAA Athletics 25% – and pay the difference to the athletes …
Most of this article focused on college football programs. The income generated in the basketball programs are even more striking, considering that the teams are smaller, travel costs are less expensive, and less than scholarships must be delivered, so the earnings from the NCAA basketball programs of the university even more amazing.
About the Author
Keith is webmaster of several sports related websites including NebraskaFootballGear.com LouisianaFootballGear.com and OhioFootballGear.com
Join Career Athletes!